Legislature(2007 - 2008)
2008-04-08 House Journal
Full Journal pdf2008-04-08 House Journal Page 2729 HJR 2 The following was read the second time: HOUSE JOINT RESOLUTION NO. 2 Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the State of Alaska requiring an affirmative vote of the people before any form of gambling for profit may be authorized in Alaska. with the: Journal Page STA RPT 1DP 1NR 4AM 1062 FN1: ZERO(H.STA) 1062 JUD RPT CS(JUD) NT 3DP 4NR 1291 FN1: ZERO(H.STA) 1291 FN2: (GOV) 1291 FIN RPT CS(FIN) NT 2DP 1DNP 6NR 2047 FN3: (GOV) 2047 2008-04-08 House Journal Page 2730 Representative Samuels moved and asked unanimous consent that the following committee substitute be adopted in lieu of the original bill: CS FOR HOUSE JOINT RESOLUTION NO. 2(FIN) Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the State of Alaska requiring an affirmative vote of the people before any form of gambling for profit may be authorized in Alaska and setting other requirements. There being no objection, it was so ordered. Representative Samuels moved and asked unanimous consent that CSHJR 2(FIN) be considered engrossed, advanced to third reading, and placed on final passage. There being no objection, it was so ordered. CSHJR 2(FIN) was read the third time. The question being: "Shall CSHJR 2(FIN) pass the House?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHJR 2(FIN) Third Reading Final Passage YEAS: 33 NAYS: 6 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Buch, Cissna, Coghill, Crawford, Dahlstrom, Doll, Doogan, Edgmon, Fairclough, Gara, Gardner, Gatto, Gruenberg, Guttenberg, Harris, Holmes, Johansen, Johnson, Kawasaki, Keller, Kelly, Kerttula, Lynn, Meyer, Neuman, Olson, Ramras, Roses, Samuels, Seaton, Stoltze, Thomas, Wilson Nays: Chenault, Hawker, Joule, LeDoux, Nelson, Salmon Excused: Foster And so, CSHJR 2(FIN) passed the House. Representative Dahlstrom gave notice of reconsideration of the vote on CSHJR 2(FIN). 2008-04-08 House Journal Page 2731 Representative Dahlstrom moved and asked unanimous consent that reconsideration of CSHJR 2(FIN) be taken up on the same day. There was objection. Representative Dahlstrom moved and asked unanimous consent to withdraw the motion. There being no objection, it was so ordered.